88,236 Companies: What the AMLO Amendment Means for Thai Villa Owners in 2026

The review does not start with the villa. It starts with the bank statement of a Thai shareholder who declares an income of 15,000 THB a month, yet appears in the company's registered capital with a paid-up stake of 2 million THB. The next question is always the same: where did the money come from? Usually there is no answer.

Today, nominee land ownership structures expose owners to criminal liability under the Foreign Business Act (FBA): a fine and up to three years in prison. That looks severe on paper, but real prison terms have been rare. Most cases ended with an order to restructure the company.

The amendment expanding the list of predicate offences under Thailand's anti-money laundering law does not change the size of the penalty. It changes the mechanism. An FBA violation becomes a trigger for AMLO proceedings: account freezes, asset forfeiture, and criminal proceedings with no option to quietly fix things retroactively. This is a different class of risk, and it has to be priced from scratch.

The direction of travel is already visible. According to Thailand Construction and Engineering News, more than 7,000 businesses have been flagged for suspect nominee structures, and foreign buyers in Phuket and Koh Samui are pausing villa purchases as the nominee loophole closes. Separately, Prime Minister Anutin Charnvirakul has ordered a probe into local officials in Phuket and Surat Thani over foreign-nominee businesses, with AMLO mechanisms to be used to scrutinize related financial transactions.

Quick Answer

• According to the Department of Business Development (DBD), 88,236 companies are registered in Thailand's resort provinces, and more than half are connected in some way to foreign owners.
• The current FBA penalty for nominee ownership: a fine of 100,000 to 1,000,000 THB plus up to 3 years in prison, together with an order to remedy the violation.
• Once FBA violations fall within AMLO's remit, the key risk shifts from a fine to freezing of accounts and forfeiture of land and buildings in favour of the state.
• AMLO can already take part in freezing assets in serious cases without waiting for the amendment. Precedents exist, and the authorities' questions to such companies are specific.
• Legal structures for a foreigner in 2026: a condominium unit within the 49% foreign quota, a registered land lease of up to 30 years, a company with genuine operating activity, or ownership via a Thai spouse with a signed waiver of rights to the asset.
• Restructuring time for a voluntary exit is 2 to 6 months. Once accounts are frozen, restructuring is no longer possible.

Scenarios and Options

Scenario one: the villa is already held by a company, with Thai shareholders who are friends of the lawyer. This is the most common story in Phuket and Samui. Its weak point is not even the tax audit but the paperwork: shareholders never paid for their shares, minutes were signed retroactively, and no dividend was paid in eight years. In a DBD review the company cannot explain why it exists. The way out is either to fill the company with real activity (rentals, staff, reporting, account movement) or to exit the asset.

Scenario two: sell now, while buyers are not yet scared off by the structure. The Phuket villa resale market already discounts company ownership. By market estimates, a house with clean leasehold sells faster than a comparable company-held house at a similar price. The louder the AMLO topic gets, the wider the gap. If you hold for another two to three years, you will likely sell for less than today.

Scenario three: move into a condominium. Boring, liquid, legal. The foreign quota is 49% of the total saleable area of the building, and the funds must arrive from abroad in foreign currency with a Foreign Exchange Transaction (FET) certificate for the full transaction amount. Rental yield in a good seafront project is 5-7% per year by market estimates, before tax and management fees, versus the 8-10% claimed in developer brochures for villas. In return, you sleep well.

Scenario four: land leasehold plus ownership of the building. The lease is registered at the Land Office for up to 30 years, with a fee of 1.1% of the total lease value over the whole term. The foreigner can hold the building in their own name separately, through a construction permit issued to them. This structure works, but it has to be built before the purchase, not repaired after.

If you plan to travel to Thailand and go through the documents in person with a lawyer and at the Land Office, allow at least a week and two trips to the provincial office. It is simpler to book a hotel near the administrative centre than at a beach 40 minutes away.

Comparison Table

Main Risks and Mistakes

Trusting preference shares. The structure with 51% held by Thais and 10:1 voting rights for the foreigner was considered an elegant solution for some fifteen years. The DBD has long looked past the articles of association at who actually paid for the shares and who receives the profit. Mitigation: documented source of funds for every shareholder, otherwise the structure collapses at the first request.

The myth of automatic lease renewal. The contract says 30+30+30. A Thai court recognises only the first 30 years as registered, and the obligation to renew does not pass automatically to a new landowner. Mitigation: narrow the circle of landowners to an entity you control together with the developer, and write penalty clauses for refusal to renew. This is not a full guarantee, and an honest lawyer will say so.

Paying in cash baht without an FET certificate. Without proof of currency inflow, a condo in the foreign quota will simply not be registered to a foreigner, and in any review you will be explaining the source of funds after the fact. Mitigation: transfer the full transaction amount from abroad in your own name with the payment purpose stated.

Calculating returns from developer promises. A guaranteed 8% for three years is often built into an inflated sale price. Mitigation: calculate from actual rents in neighbouring completed projects last season, not from the presentation.

Delaying restructuring until the first letter arrives. Once an AMLO procedure begins, you can no longer sell the asset or move money. Mitigation: restructure before questions are ever raised about the company.

Our position: if a villa was bought through a nominee company and is worth less than 20-25 million THB, holding it further is not worthwhile. Accounting, audit and legal upkeep of the structure eat a noticeable share of rental income, and the discount at a future sale will outweigh any savings. There is one exception: you live in the house yourself, the company runs a genuine business with staff and reporting, and the property is a home rather than an investment. In that case, do not calculate yield; calculate the cost of bringing the paperwork into order.

FAQ

Can a villa bought through a company five years ago be confiscated?

Yes, if nominee ownership is proven. The passage of time does not make the structure legal: the violation is treated as continuing for as long as the company holds the land. The earlier you exit the scheme, the cheaper it will be.

Has the AMLO amendment already been adopted?

As of early 2026, the expansion of the list of predicate offences is under discussion and the final wording may change. But AMLO already joins asset freezes in serious cases, so waiting for adoption as a signal to act is not advisable.

How much does it cost to maintain a Thai company per year?

Accounting and filing run roughly 20,000-40,000 THB per year for a company with no turnover, audit from 15,000 THB, plus the annual shareholders' meeting. With genuine operations and staff, costs rise several times over through social contributions and taxes.

Can a foreigner legally own land in Thailand?

Practically no. The exception is an investment of 40 million THB or more through a Board of Investment scheme, with permission for a plot of up to 1 rai for housing, and such permissions are issued sparingly. For the vast majority of buyers, only condos, leasehold, and owned buildings are realistic.

What is safer: a condo in the 49% quota or a leasehold villa?

For a rental investor, the condo: easier resale, fewer document questions, lower entry cheque. For family living, a leasehold villa, but with a fresh lease term and a clear landowner.

How can I check whether my Thai shareholders look nominee to the DBD?

Ask three test questions. Did they pay for their shares with their own funds? Do they have documented income consistent with the size of their contribution? Have they received dividends? If the answer to any of these is no, the structure is vulnerable.

What should I do if the company's accounts are already frozen?

A Thai criminal defence lawyer experienced in AMLO procedures, immediately. Selling the asset, moving money, or changing shareholders is not possible at this stage.

Will this affect villa prices in Phuket?

By market estimates, secondary-market villas held through companies already trade at a discount to comparable clean-leasehold properties. New projects sold from the start as leasehold with Land Office registration tend to benefit from the AMLO topic.

The first thing to do this week: pull out your Thai company's incorporation documents and check whether each shareholder can prove the source of the money for their stake. If not, start restructuring or exit the asset now, while the decision is still yours and not an investigator's.

Source: Thailand Construction and Engineering News

Ready to invest in Thailand? Our experts will help you find the perfect property.