Thailand's List 3 Reform in 2026: What It Means for Property Investors

In May 2026, a headline out of Bangkok sounded like the country was finally opening its doors: the cabinet approved in principle the removal of nine service categories from List 3 of the Foreign Business Act (FBA). Within a day, expat chats had turned it into 'foreigners will be allowed to buy land.'

They will not. The FBA reform concerns service companies, not property rights. The Land Code is untouched, the 49% foreign quota on condominium floor area is untouched, and a 30-year leasehold is still a leasehold.

More than that, the cabinet decision changes nothing legally yet. Before it applies, it must be reviewed by the Office of the Council of State and published in the Royal Gazette. Between 'approved in principle' and 'in force', Thailand typically takes anywhere from several months to a couple of years.

Key Facts

• May 2026: the cabinet approved in principle the removal of nine service categories from List 3 of the FBA. For these activities, a separate Foreign Business License will no longer be required.
• The change takes effect only after review by the Office of the Council of State and publication in the Royal Gazette. Until then, the existing licensing regime applies unchanged.
• In banking, insurance and telecoms, foreign participation remains capped below 50% unless a regulator grants a special permit.
• The Financial Institution Business Act of 2008 (FIBA) lets the Bank of Thailand approve foreign ownership of an existing bank up to 49% case by case. Anything above 49% requires approval from the Minister of Finance on the central bank's recommendation.
• The Expropriation of Immovable Property Act sets out the seizure procedure, the compensation mechanism and the right to appeal in Thai courts. Indirect expropriation, meaning regulatory measures that erode an asset's value without a formal taking, is not covered.
• The Condominium Act keeps the cap: foreigners may collectively own no more than 49% of the saleable area of a building. The rest is reserved for Thai individuals and Thai legal entities.
• Direct land ownership by a foreign individual is prohibited under the Land Code. Narrow exceptions (the 40 million THB investment scheme, inheritance with restrictions) are almost never used in practice.
• Enforcement is tightening: since mid-2025, systematic cross-checks between the Land Department and the Department of Business Development have targeted Thai nominee companies that are effectively controlled by foreigners.

Story and Context

The FBA, in its 1999 form, split the economy into three lists. List 1 is closed to foreigners entirely, List 2 requires cabinet-level approval, and List 3 is the one where a license is needed because Thai business in those niches is considered not yet ready for competition. Legal services, accounting, construction, advertising and retail below the set capital threshold all sit there. The nine categories the cabinet chose to remove in 2026 are an acknowledgement of the obvious: over a quarter of a century, Thai service companies in these niches have matured, and the license barrier has arguably deterred foreign capital more than it has protected locals.

The paradox is that almost nobody tackled the barrier head-on. Instead, the market built a workaround: a Thai company with 51% held by local shareholders who formally own the shares while actually holding them for a foreign beneficiary. This is a nominee structure, expressly prohibited by the FBA. It worked for years as an accepted norm of doing business, until the Department of Special Investigation and the land offices began auditing these schemes in a targeted way, mostly around villas with land in Phuket. Investigations have since widened from single companies to entire networks. In Pattaya and Banglamung, authorities seized computers and documents at three addresses to identify real owners and controlling parties, building on earlier probes in Samui, Phangan and Phuket. The outcome is not a fine paid at the counter but a demand to sell the asset, plus criminal exposure for the Thai nominees.

Our conclusion for a private investor is an uncomfortable one: the List 3 reform gives you nothing. It is about management companies, service contractors, agencies and IT outsourcing. If you are buying a home, your real constraints are the 49% quota in the building, the ban on land ownership, and the quality of your lease agreement. None of those three moved by a millimetre in May 2026.

There is also a layer that is rarely discussed: expropriation. On paper the mechanism is clear. The state takes the property, pays compensation, and the owner goes to court if they dispute the valuation. Recent investment climate reports do not record cases of direct seizure from foreign investors. But the absence of any rule on indirect expropriation means something else: if a zoning change, a new building regulation or a height restriction collapses the value of your plot, there is no compensation. In Phuket and Samui this is not theoretical, since coastal and hillside building restrictions have been rewritten more than once, and each time someone was left holding land on which they could not build what they bought it for.

There is also a curious asymmetry. Since 1966, US citizens have operated under the Treaty of Amity and Economic Relations, which gives them near-national treatment and the ability to own a company 100% in most sectors. 'Near', because land, transport, communications and several other fields are excluded from the treaty. An American can own a Thai service company outright but still cannot buy land. It is the best illustration that corporate liberalisation and property rights in Thailand live in different legal universes.

A practical point for anyone running a transaction remotely. Registering the transfer of title and registering a long-term lease both take place at the district Land Office, which requires either personal attendance or a properly executed power of attorney with a Thai translation. If you are travelling to close, allow a minimum of three working days per property: tax calculations at the office are done on the spot and sometimes differ from what your lawyer calculated.

When can all of the above be safely ignored? If you are buying a completed condominium unit worth up to 6 million THB, as freehold, within the foreign quota, with funds transferred through a bank and a Foreign Exchange Transaction (FET) form in your own name. In that case your deal is protected by exactly the same rules as any Thai buyer's, and corporate law does not touch you at all.

FAQ

Can foreigners own land in Thailand in 2026?

No. The Land Code keeps the ban on direct land ownership by a foreign individual, and the May 2026 List 3 reform does not touch it. The workable options are a registered 30-year lease or a freehold condominium unit within the 49% quota.

What exactly changed in the Foreign Business Act in May 2026?

The cabinet approved in principle the removal of nine service categories from List 3. Companies in those niches will no longer need a separate Foreign Business License. The change only takes effect after review by the Office of the Council of State and publication in the Royal Gazette.

How risky is a Thai company with nominee shareholders?

It is a direct violation of the FBA. The risk is not theoretical: land office and DSI inspections in Phuket have ended in orders to sell the asset. Thai nominees face criminal liability, and the foreign beneficiary loses the money invested.

What share of a Thai bank can foreigners own?

Under the 2008 law, the Bank of Thailand can approve up to 49% of an existing bank on an individual basis. Going above that requires the Minister of Finance, on the central bank's recommendation. Insurance and telecoms follow a similar cap of below 50% without a special permit.

Can the state seize my property in Thailand?

Formally yes, under the Expropriation of Immovable Property Act, with compensation and a right to appeal in court. No recent cases of direct seizure from foreign investors have been recorded. The bigger danger is indirect expropriation through zoning or building-code changes, which is not compensated at all.

Which is safer, a 30-year leasehold or a freehold condo?

A freehold condominium unit with a properly documented FET is legally stronger, because it is a registered ownership right rather than a contractual obligation. A leasehold makes sense when you want a house with land or when the building's foreign quota is already used up.

How do I check whether a building still has foreign quota available?

Request a statement from the condominium's juristic entity on the area ratio and compare it with Land Office data for the specific project. The developer should confirm the remaining quota in writing before you pay any deposit.

Will setting up a service company become easier?

For the nine categories being removed, yes, once the change is published in the Royal Gazette. For everything else the regime is unchanged: an FBA license, BOI promotion, or a structure with a genuine Thai partner who contributes genuine capital.

A practical step for the coming months: do not treat List 3 liberalisation as a signal to buy land, because there is no land in it. Check the remaining foreign quota in your building in writing and, if you take a leasehold, insist on registration of the full 30-year term at the Land Office rather than verbal promises of renewal.

Source: The CITY Asia

Ready to invest in Thailand? Our experts will help you find the perfect property.