Thailand's DBD Order 2/2569: Nominee Company Schemes Face a Hard Deadline from August 2026

The setup has looked the same for twenty years. A foreigner buys a villa in Phuket, a lawyer finds two Thai partners, shares are split 51 to 49, preferred voting rights get written into the articles, and within two weeks the company owns the land. Nobody ever asked how a Thai retiree earning 12,000 baht a month came up with 2 million baht to pay for those shares.

From 1 August 2026, someone finally is asking. Thailand's Department of Business Development (DBD), under the Ministry of Commerce, has issued Order No. 2/2569, replacing the earlier instructions 2/2568 and parts of 1/2569, and it requires tracing foreign-linked money from start to finish.

Key Facts

• DBD Order No. 2/2569 takes effect on 1 August 2026, replacing earlier company-verification instructions, including 2/2568 and parts of 1/2569.

• The Investment Explanation Letter (IEL) is a new mandatory form documenting, transfer by transfer, the movement of funds from Thai shareholders into the company's receiving account. It stays permanently in the registrar's file.

• The full documentation package is triggered not only by new company registrations but by any filing after 1 August 2026 that adds a foreign minority shareholder or a foreign authorized signatory to an existing Thai company.

• The rule applies to partnerships and companies with a Thai stake below 50% involving a foreign national, as well as several structures where no foreign shareholder appears on paper at all.

• The package requires bank statements from Thai shareholders plus statements from the company's receiving account, meaning regulators check the origin of funds, not just the balance on signing day.

• According to Nation Thailand, DBD's crackdown has already flagged 29 accounting firms and 140 accountants involved in facilitating nominee arrangements, and Touchdown Asia reports roughly 120,000 firms nationwide may fall under the new bank-statement verification requirement.

• Section 36 of the Foreign Business Act (FBA) punishes nominee ownership with up to 3 years in prison and a fine of 100,000 to 1,000,000 baht, plus a daily fine for continuing violations. Thai nationals who agree to act as nominees face the same liability.

• Section 74 of the Land Code has long allowed land offices to check the source of funds behind Thai shareholders in a land transaction. What is new in 2026 is that this data now sits inside DBD in digitized form and can be cross-checked between agencies.

Story and Context

Nominee structures in Thailand did not emerge from foreign greed alone. They grew out of simple arithmetic: the Condominium Act lets a foreigner hold a freehold unit, but only within 49% of a building's sellable area, and land itself cannot be owned by a foreigner at all. Anything that is not a condo unit, a villa, a plot, a land-based townhouse, requires either a registered 30-year lease at the Land Department or a Thai legal entity.

The first wave of scrutiny came in 2006, after the scandal surrounding the sale of Shin Corp to a Singaporean fund, when it emerged that Thai holding companies in the ownership chain were effectively controlled by the foreign buyer through preferred shares. DBD then told provincial offices, for the first time, to request proof of financial capacity from Thai shareholders. In practice this became a single bank certificate obtainable on signing day, with the money wired back to the sender the next morning.

That is precisely the loophole the IEL closes. Tracing funds "end to end" means the registrar sees not an account balance, but a sequence of transfers: who sent what, when, and where the sender's own money came from. A one-day deposit scheme simply does not survive that scrutiny.

A second wave arrived in 2023-2024, when Thailand's Department of Special Investigation and the land offices in Phuket and Koh Samui began spot-checking villas registered to companies with no real operations: no staff, no revenue, one asset on the books, and a loss recorded every year. The logic is simple and hard to argue with: a company that has done no business for a decade while holding one house occupied by its foreign director was never built for business.

Nationwide, the scale of the review is significant. Nation Thailand reports that DBD is examining 36,277 foreign-linked landholding companies, with focused scrutiny on 31,516 firms where foreign ownership sits at 49% or below, precisely the range where nominee arrangements tend to cluster.

One popular misconception deserves correction. Many owners assume the order only applies to brand-new registrations, and that older structures remain in a quiet gray zone. That is wrong. The trigger is any new filing on an existing company. A change of director, a share sale, replacing a departing Thai shareholder, adding a foreign signatory, any of these pulls a company that has quietly existed for fifteen years into the same scrutiny as one incorporated yesterday. And since most such structures eventually require a shareholder change (people move away, pass away, fall out), the queue reaches them naturally.

A second misconception: registering changes before 1 August somehow offers protection. The order governs registration procedure, not the underlying offense. Liability under Section 36 of the FBA does not come with a retroactive amnesty; if a structure is a nominee arrangement, it remains one regardless of which order was in force on filing day.

My view: for buying a home for personal use, a Thai company is a poor tool in 2026. Maintaining the entity costs money (bookkeeping and mandatory audit run an estimated 30,000 to 60,000 baht a year by market estimates), demands annual filings, and scares off some buyers on resale who don't want to inherit someone else's shareholder history. A registered 30-year lease, with a 1% registration fee on the total lease value and a 0.1% stamp duty, looks less glamorous but survives any audit. For a condo within the foreign quota, the question doesn't even arise: freehold, held personally.

One exception to everything above: if you run a genuine operating company with revenue, Thai employees on payroll, and real partners, Order 2/2569 is an administrative inconvenience, an extra stack of paperwork, not a threat. Your IEL gets filled out honestly, because the money genuinely moved the way it's described.

A practical detail for anyone structuring a deal right now: banks and DBD increasingly require the foreign director's personal presence when opening a corporate account, and one trip rarely settles it. If you're planning two or three visits a quarter, it pays to book flights well ahead rather than scrambling a week before signing.

Source: Nation Thailand

FAQ

What is the IEL and who signs it?

The Investment Explanation Letter is a mandatory form, effective 1 August 2026, describing fund movements transfer by transfer from Thai shareholders to the company's receiving account. It is signed by Thai shareholders and authorized directors, and it stays in DBD's registrar file.

My company is ten years old. Does this affect me?

Not until your first new filing with DBD. Once you submit changes that add a foreign minority shareholder or a foreign signatory, the full package activates: Thai shareholder bank statements, receiving-account statements, and the IEL.

What is the penalty for a nominee structure?

Section 36 of the Foreign Business Act carries up to 3 years in prison and a fine of 100,000 to 1,000,000 baht, plus a daily fine for a continuing violation. Both sides face liability, including the Thai nominee shareholders.

Can I buy a villa without a company?

Yes. A 30-year lease registered at the Land Department against the title deed (chanote) is the standard working option. The registration fee is 1% of the total lease value, plus a 0.1% stamp duty. The leasehold claim can be inherited if the contract states so explicitly.

Are condos also at risk?

No, provided the unit is bought personally within the foreign quota of 49% of a building's sellable area, with funds wired in from abroad and a Foreign Exchange Transaction (FET) form issued. No company is needed in that structure.

How does DBD verify the origin of a Thai shareholder's money?

Through the shareholder's own bank statements and the receiving account's statements. A single large deposit landing the day before signing, then wired back to the sender, is exactly the scenario Order 2/2569 is designed to catch.

Is it worth unwinding an existing structure now?

If the company holds one residential asset and conducts no real business, yes, it is worth modeling a switch to a long-term lease or a sale to a Thai buyer. The transfer needs to account for transfer tax and possible corporate income tax, so the decision belongs with an accountant, not with advice from the seller.

Do Thai partners from a law firm solve the problem?

No, and they never really did. With the IEL form, the link between the source of funds and the shareholder is documented in writing and signed under liability. It is exactly the kind of document a prosecutor no longer needs to build from scratch.

If you hold a Thai company set up for housing, start with an accountant rather than a property lawyer: pull the share-capital payment statements and honestly assess whether they would survive an IEL-style reconstruction. The answer determines whether you have months for a calm restructuring or only weeks.

Ready to invest in Thailand? Our experts will help you find the perfect property.