Thailand's 2026 Crackdown: Business Opens Up, Nominee Land Deals Close Down

At the Talang land office in northern Phuket, a deal stalled on the third document. A Thai company with three local shareholders was buying a plot for a villa, the paperwork looked clean, and the transfer fee was calculated. Then the officer asked for bank statements and tax filings from the Thai holders of the 51% stake. There were none: two of the three had a combined declared income that did not cover even a tenth of their capital contribution.

That scene captures exactly what Thailand's August 2026 orders are about. With one hand, the government is removing licensing barriers for foreign business. With the other, it is methodically dismantling the scheme that has underpinned the non-resident land market for decades.

For property buyers, the second hand matters more. The Foreign Business Act relief applies to service-sector activities, not land ownership. The Land Code itself has not changed. What has changed is the depth of scrutiny.

Key Facts

• On August 28, 2026, the Royal Gazette published two ministerial regulations removing the Foreign Business License requirement for several categories of activity under the Foreign Business Act, replaced by additional verification procedures and supporting documentation.

• On August 25, 2026, an internal circular (No. MorTor 0515.2/Wor 19097) instructed provincial land offices to intensify checks for nominee ownership, including scrutiny of transactions already registered.

• Some checks now directly target proof that no nominee structure exists: the source of funds of Thai shareholders, their real economic role, and the origin of registered capital.

• Under Section 36 of the Foreign Business Act, using nominees carries up to 3 years in prison and a fine of 100,000 to 1,000,000 baht, plus a daily penalty for continued violation. Thai nationals who agree to act as front owners face the same liability.

• The Land Code still bars non-residents from owning land. If illegal acquisition is found, the Director-General of the Department of Lands can order a forced sale within 180 days to 1 year.

• Condominium units remain unaffected: foreigners can hold up to 49% of the total unit area in a building, provided funds are remitted from abroad and a Foreign Exchange Transaction Certificate is obtained, required for transfers of USD 50,000 or more.

• The maximum registrable lease term for land or premises under the Civil and Commercial Code is 30 years.

• In Phuket alone, more than 100 firms with combined revenue exceeding 5 billion baht last year are now undergoing financial tracing after eight police raids that led to 16 prosecutions, including 10 Thai nationals, 2 Canadians, 3 Russians and 1 Kazakhstani national. Nationwide, 361 companies are under closer scrutiny for suspected foreign control disguised through naturalized Thai shareholders.

Story and Context

The nominee scheme was never legal. It was merely tolerated, and that distinction matters now more than ever.

The Foreign Business Act of 1999 replaced the 1972 Alien Business Law but kept the same core principle: control of a company is defined by shareholding, not actual management. The market did the obvious thing. A foreign buyer would register a Thai company, hand 51% to three Thai nationals, keep preferred shares carrying multiple votes per share, and have the nominees sign undated resignation letters and share pledges. On paper, the land belonged to the company. In practice, it belonged to the villa buyer in Rawai or on Chaweng.

The first enforcement wave came in 2006, after the Temasek-Shin Corp deal turned the nominee issue into a political flashpoint. The Ministry of Commerce circulated a warning, land offices in Phuket and Samui froze for a few months, and then business returned to normal. A second wave in 2018-2019 also fizzled out.

The third wave, which began building in 2024-2025 and crystallized in the August 2026 orders, works differently. Earlier crackdowns checked the paper structure: who is a shareholder, what percentage, who is a director. This time, officials check the money. They request the source of funds for each Thai shareholder and cross-reference it against tax records. A structure built around three friends of a driver, each supposedly contributing two million baht on a declared income of 15,000 baht a month, collapses on the first question. And scrutiny does not stop at registration: the circular explicitly extends oversight to transactions completed after the title deed (chanote) was already issued.

Here is what does not solve the problem, despite what some villa sellers will claim. Converting a company structure into a long-term lease does not fully fix things either. Only 30 years is actually registrable. The common '30+30' renewal clause binds only the original contracting parties under Thai court practice and has no force against a new owner of the land if it is sold or inherited. In practice, buyers get 30 years of enforceable right and 60 years of a promise.

There is a legal path to direct land ownership: Section 96 bis of the Land Code allows a foreigner to acquire up to 1 rai for residential use with a 40 million baht investment in approved assets and Ministry of Interior approval. Market estimates suggest the number of permits actually granted under this provision over its entire existence can be counted on one hand. It should not be treated as a practical tool.

The FBA relief and the nominee crackdown are two sides of the same policy logic. Thailand's message is: run your business openly, register as a foreign company, get BOI promotion, pay your taxes. Just do not pretend to be Thai.

The practical consequence for buyers is that transactions have slowed down and now often require personal presence. Land offices increasingly refuse to accept a power of attorney for signing and want to see the buyer in person. If you are planning an inspection trip tied to a specific deal, budget at least a week in the provinces, since a two-to-three-day delay in registration has become routine.

My view: for residential property in 2026, it makes sense to buy a condominium unit within the foreign quota and avoid engineering workarounds. If land ownership is truly required, the only honest structure is a registered 30-year lease from an owner with a clean title, paired with a superficies right (up to 30 years) over the structure itself, so the house is owned separately from the land. That delivers less than a company scheme promises, but it holds up in court. The one exception is a foreign investor running an active, BOI-promoted operating business in Thailand with genuine Thai partners who have demonstrable income; in that case, corporate land ownership remains workable. In every other case, a company set up purely to hold a villa is now a deferred risk of forced sale.

FAQ

Can a foreigner own land in Thailand in 2026?

As a general rule, no. The Land Code maintains the ban, and the August 2026 reforms did not touch it. The Section 96 bis exception (up to 1 rai with a 40 million baht investment) requires personal Ministry of Interior approval and is almost never granted in practice.

What actually changed on August 28, 2026?

Two ministerial regulations published in the Royal Gazette removed the mandatory Foreign Business License for certain activities, easing entry for foreign businesses in service sectors. In exchange, documentation requirements and nominee-structure verification were tightened.

What is the risk of owning a villa through a Thai company?

Under Section 36 of the Foreign Business Act, penalties reach up to 3 years in prison and a fine of 100,000 to 1,000,000 baht. Separately, the Land Code allows authorities to order a forced sale within 180 days to a year. Thai nominees face the same liability as the foreign buyer.

Are older, already-closed deals being reviewed too?

Yes. The August 25, 2026 circular explicitly extends enforcement to transactions after title has already been issued. There is no statute of limitations automatically protecting an old structure.

Is buying a condominium unit safe?

It is the most protected form of foreign ownership. Foreigners can hold up to 49% of total unit area in a building. Funds must be remitted from abroad in foreign currency, and a bank's Foreign Exchange Transaction Certificate is required for transfers of USD 50,000 or more. Without it, the land office will not register the transfer.

Does a 30+30+30 year lease actually work?

Only the first 30 years is registered and enforceable. Renewal depends on the landowner's willingness at expiry and, under Thai court practice, does not bind a new owner of the land. Plan around a 30-year horizon, not 90.

What documents does the land office request from Thai shareholders?

Bank statements, tax filings, proof of the source of funds used for capital contributions, and a description of their genuine role in the company. A mismatch between declared income and contribution size is the main trigger for rejection.

Should existing company-held villas be restructured now?

If a villa is held through a company with nominal shareholders, it is worth discussing with a Thai lawyer in advance, either converting to a registered lease or making the structure genuine with real partners, verifiable funds, and actual business activity. Waiting for a land office inquiry will not make it cheaper.

Source: Legal 500

Ready to invest in Thailand? Our experts will help you find the perfect property.