Thailand Nominee Crackdown 2026: What the August 25 Circular Changes for Foreign Buyers

A land office officer in Phuket no longer waits for a complaint or an anonymous tip. He pulls the shareholder register of a company that bought a villa plot in Rawai three years ago and asks a simple question: where did Thai shareholders declaring an income of 15,000 baht a month find the money for a 10 million baht stake?

On 25 August 2026, Thailand's Ministry of Interior sent all provincial governors Circular No. MorTor 0515.2/Wor 19097. It introduces no new prohibition, because land has been closed to foreigners since 1954. What it changes is who looks for violations and how quickly they find them.

Three changes work together. Police and other specialist investigative bodies, including local police chiefs, join provincial investigation committees, opening access to shareholder data, tax filings, immigration history and bank records. Land offices must now screen legal entities proactively using risk indicators, not only on complaint. And a two-track mechanism follows: forced disposal of the land plus criminal prosecution of the people behind the scheme.

If you own a villa in Samui held through a Thai company with 49% foreign participation and three Thai shareholders you have never met, this affects you directly.

Key Facts

• Circular No. MorTor 0515.2/Wor 19097, dated 25 August 2026, went to every provincial governor and expands the powers of committees investigating nominee land ownership.
• Committees now include police and specialist investigators, giving them access to shareholder composition, tax, immigration and financial records.
• Provincial land offices must actively screen legal entities (companies and partnerships) for risk indicators. Findings go to the committee, which decides whether the company is a foreign person under the Land Code.
• Consequences run on two tracks. Under Section 94 of the Land Code, the owner gets 180 days to one year to sell voluntarily, after which the Land Department may sell the plot itself and retain roughly 5% of the proceeds.
• Using nominees to circumvent the Foreign Business Act carries fines of 100,000 to 1,000,000 baht and imprisonment of up to 3 years, including for the Thai citizens who agreed to act as nominees.
• Foreigners can still hold up to 49% of floor area in a condominium as freehold (Condominium Act of 1979), and registered land leases of up to 30 years.
• A legal route to land exists under Section 96 bis (since 2002): an investment of 40 million baht in approved assets for at least three years can earn the right to 1 rai of residential land with ministerial approval. In practice, approvals have been very rare.
• Regional enforcement is already visible: in August 2026 Thai police detained 19 Russian nationals (three more were identified in Phuket) in investigations tied to hundreds of companies and nominee owners, covering about 775 homes across six residential projects worth more than 5 billion baht.

Story and Context

The ban on foreign land ownership in Thailand is older than most of today's investors. It was set by the 1954 Land Code and has outlasted well over a dozen governments, none of which chose to repeal it. Land is the part of sovereignty Thai politics does not trade. An industry of workarounds grew up around the ban instead.

The most common structure looks tidy: a Thai company is registered, 51% of shares are recorded in the names of Thai citizens, 49% belong to the foreigner, and the company buys the plot. Legally, a Thai entity owns the land. In reality, the Thai shareholders never contributed capital, receive no dividends, and sign blank share-transfer powers of attorney. The Ministry of Interior already instructed offices in 2006 to check the source of funds of Thai shareholders in deals involving foreigners, so the scheme has been formally vulnerable for years. But enforcement was reactive. The office reviewed paperwork at the point of sale, and afterwards the company lived its own life.

The 2026 circular breaks that logic. Scrutiny becomes continuous and retrospective, so structures created ten years ago are now in scope.

The red flags are well known to practitioners:

• Thai shareholders with minimal declared income holding large stakes.
• A company with no revenue, no staff and nil accounts.
• Preference shares where the Thai majority gets one vote per ten shares while the foreigner gets ten votes per share.
• One registered address, often a consultant's office, shared by twenty companies.
• A balance sheet whose only asset is a villa occupied by the foreign director.

Previously, someone had to notice these signs. Now they are searched for systematically.

Two popular beliefs deserve a second look. The first is buying land in the name of a Thai wife, still recommended in many expat chats as the safe route. Legally the transaction is clean, since a Thai citizen may own land. But at registration the spouses sign a declaration that the funds are the Thai spouse's personal property and that the foreigner has no claim. That signature cuts both ways: it strips the foreigner of property rights in a divorce, and it becomes ready-made evidence of nominee ownership if the money is shown to have come from the foreigner's account. The structure does not fail in ordinary life. It fails exactly when protection is needed.

The second is the 30+30+30 lease. Thai law recognises only the first 30-year term as registrable, and the Supreme Court of Thailand has repeatedly held that a renewal promise is a personal obligation of the lessor, not binding on heirs or a new owner of the land. So the "90 years" in a developer's brochure is really 30 years of protection plus 60 years of goodwill from a counterparty who may not exist in three decades. A proposal to extend leases to 99 years was discussed by the cabinet in 2024, drew a sharp political reaction, and never became law.

The practical conclusion is straightforward. For a home or rental property up to roughly 25-30 million baht, a company is unnecessary and now harmful. A freehold condominium within the 49% foreign quota gives genuine title and resale liquidity that a company-held villa will lack: a buyer in 2027 will open the conversation by asking who your shareholders are. For land under a house, a sensible structure is a 30-year registered lease at the land office plus a superficies right (up to 30 years, registered separately), which makes you the owner of the building itself. It is weaker than freehold, but more honest than a nominee.

There is one important exception. If you run a genuine operating business, such as a hotel, restaurant group or manufacturing operation, with real revenue, Thai employees and audited accounts, a Thai company holding land on its balance sheet is fully legitimate and should not raise screening concerns. The circular targets shell companies, not businesses.

Owners of existing structures should put their house in order before someone opens the file: document the Thai shareholders' capital contributions, hold real shareholder meetings, file proper accounts, drop skewed preference-share voting, and where possible move the asset onto a long-term lease. Restructuring costs money and taxes. A forced sale under Section 94 on a compressed timeline costs more, and the discount to market on a distressed Phuket sale can easily reach 20-30%.

FAQ

Can a foreigner buy land in Thailand in 2026?

As a general rule, no. The 1954 Land Code bars foreign nationals from owning land. The exceptions are BOI-promoted investments, IEAT industrial zones, and Section 96 bis, where an investment of 40 million baht for at least three years can earn the right to 1 rai of residential land with the Interior Minister's approval.

Is a Thai company with 49% foreign ownership dangerous in itself?

No, it is legal in itself. The danger is a company with no business activity whose Thai shareholders never paid in capital. A committee can classify it as a foreign person under the Land Code, after which the land is subject to disposal, and everyone involved, including Thai nominees, risks a fine of 100,000 to 1,000,000 baht and up to 3 years in prison under the Foreign Business Act.

How does the land office detect a nominee structure?

By cross-referencing data. The 25 August 2026 circular gives committees access to tax filings, bank records, immigration data and shareholder registers. Key indicators include a Thai shareholder's income being out of proportion to their stake, zero company revenue, preference shares with disproportionate voting rights, and dozens of firms registered at the same address.

What happens to the land if a structure is ruled nominee?

Two tracks start at once. Administratively, Section 94 of the Land Code sets a period of 180 days to one year to sell, failing which the Land Department sells the plot and keeps about 5%. Criminally, a case is opened against the foreign beneficiary and the Thai nominees.

Is buying land in a Thai wife's name safe?

Legally she alone owns it. The declaration a foreign spouse signs at the land office expressly confirms that the funds are not his. In a divorce you have no rights to the plot, and in an inspection the same declaration works against you if the money trail says otherwise.

Does a 30-year lease with 30+30 renewal options work?

Only the first 30 years are registered and protected. Under the practice of Thai courts, a renewal option is a personal obligation of the lessor and does not bind a new landowner. For commercial and industrial purposes, a separate 1999 law allows leases of up to 50 years with renewal.

Does the tightening affect condominium owners?

Not directly. The 49% foreign quota of building area under the 1979 Condominium Act is unchanged, and freehold on an apartment remains the cleanest form of ownership. There is an indirect effect: demand that once went into company-held villas is shifting toward the condominium quota.

I already have such a company. Should I sell urgently?

Not necessarily. Start with an audit: restore documentary proof of the Thai shareholders' contributions, remove voting skew, put reporting in order, and consider moving the asset into a registered lease with a right of construction. A rushed sale under an enforcement order will cost more than a restructuring done in advance.

Source: Fontanka.ru

Ready to invest in Thailand? Our experts will help you find the perfect property.