Thailand's New 2026 Nominee Crackdown: What the August Circular Means for Villa Owners

A villa in Cherngtalay sits registered under a Thai company. Three Thai nationals hold 51% of the shares. None of them has ever attended a shareholder meeting, and two of them report a monthly income under 15,000 baht. Two years ago, this setup was routine and would clear land office registration without a single question asked.

Since 25 August 2026, this is exactly the kind of structure that gets flagged first.

Thailand's Ministry of Interior issued Circular MorTor 0515.2/Wor 19097. The document does not create new prohibitions: foreigners have been barred from owning land since 1954, and using nominee shareholders has always been a criminal offense. What the circular changes is the detection mechanism. Provincial land offices are now required to proactively screen companies for nominee red flags and refer them to investigation committees, with no complaint or external tip needed to trigger a review.

If you own a condominium under the foreign freehold quota, none of this applies to you. If your villa sits inside a Thai company structure, keep reading.

Key Facts

• On 25 August 2026, Thailand's Ministry of Interior issued Circular MorTor 0515.2/Wor 19097, tightening enforcement against nominee land ownership by foreigners.

• Investigation committees have been expanded: provincial panels must now include representatives from specialized law-enforcement bodies, including police, with access to shareholder records, tax filings, immigration data and banking information.

• Screening is now proactive: provincial land offices identify and flag companies and partnerships showing nominee risk indicators themselves, rather than waiting for external complaints.

• Two separate consequences apply: forced divestment of land for structures classified as foreign under the Land Code, on a timeline set by the provincial governor, and separate criminal prosecution for companies formed specifically to hold land on behalf of a foreigner.

• The circular builds on a 2023 directive that first established provincial-level investigation frameworks for nominee cases.

• The foreign ownership threshold under the Land Code remains unchanged: a company is classified as foreign if foreign ownership exceeds 49% of shares, or if foreigners dominate the shareholder base.

• Section 94 of the Land Code sets a divestment window of no less than 180 days and no more than one year.

• Separately, Thailand's Department of Business Development (DBD) tightened company registration requirements on the same date, 25 August 2026, specifically to close loopholes that let foreigners control Thai companies through nominee shareholders, a move that directly affects foreign-driven property demand in Phuket and other resort regions.

Story and Context

Thailand's ban on foreign land ownership is older than most of the resorts it now governs. The 1954 Land Code was written for a completely different country: Phuket back then ran on tin and rubber, not 30-million-baht villas. A narrow exception was carved out under Section 96 bis: invest 40 million baht into the Thai economy, obtain Ministry of Interior approval, and own up to one rai of residential land. The provision technically still exists, but market estimates suggest only a handful of approvals have ever been granted over two decades. In practice, it is close to meaningless.

So the market invented the Thai company workaround instead. A lawyer sets up a Company Limited, allocates 49% of shares to the foreigner, and distributes the remaining 51% among Thai nationals sourced through the same law firm. The foreigner becomes sole director with signing authority, holds preferred shares carrying amplified voting weight, and the Thai shareholders sign blank share transfer forms. The scheme ran smoothly for a decade and a half, becoming so standardized that it was pitched directly in project showrooms across Phuket and Koh Samui.

The first real jolt came in 2023, when the Ministry of Interior required provinces to set up nominee investigation committees. Inspections of Phuket villa-owning companies picked up, and the market got its first glimpse that an investigation could reach as far as interrogating Thai shareholders. But the system stayed reactive: without a complaint, there was no review.

The August 2026 circular removes that safety net entirely. Land offices now cross-check data on their own initiative, and committee access to tax, banking and immigration records turns due diligence from a formality into a genuine reconstruction of money flow. The question that trips up most structures is simple: how does a shareholder earning 12,000 baht a month afford to pay for 51% of a company that bought land worth 20 million baht?

It's worth spelling out what no longer offers protection. The preferred-share arrangement, where the Thai majority holds one vote per ten shares, now works against the owner: disproportionate voting rights are read as a direct marker of circumvention, not a defense. The Thai-spouse route doesn't hold up either. Since 1999, land offices have required both spouses to sign a declaration stating the purchase funds belong solely to the Thai spouse, with the foreigner holding no claim to them. Sign that document, and you have legally waived your invested capital.

My recommendation for anyone currently holding a villa through a company with no genuine underlying business: don't wait for a letter from the land office. There are two workable paths, and both are unglamorous. The first is converting the property into a 30-year lease registered at the land office, with the tenant's rights entered on the chanote title and protected against third parties. The second is selling and redeploying into a freehold condominium unit, within the 49% of building area open to foreign buyers. One caveat worth repeating: a lease is not equivalent to ownership, and a '30+30' renewal promise in a contract does not create a real property right. Thailand's Supreme Court has consistently ruled that a renewal option is a personal obligation of the original landowner, one that does not transfer to a new buyer of the land.

If restructuring is required, plan for an in-person visit: signing before a provincial land office official by power of attorney isn't accepted everywhere or every time, so it's simpler to book flights in advance and settle the matter in a single trip.

FAQ

Can a foreigner own land in Thailand in 2026?

No, with rare exceptions. Section 96 bis of the Land Code allows ownership of up to one rai with a 40-million-baht investment and Ministry of Interior approval, but approvals are granted very rarely. Foreigners can freely buy condominium units on a freehold basis, within the 49% of a building's saleable area reserved for foreign ownership.

What exactly did the 25 August 2026 circular change?

It required provincial land offices to proactively identify companies showing signs of nominee ownership, and added police and specialized investigators with access to tax, banking and immigration data to the investigation committees. On the same date, the Department of Business Development also tightened company registration rules to close related loopholes.

What penalties apply to a nominee structure?

The Land Code provides for up to 2 years imprisonment and/or a fine up to 20,000 baht for acquiring land on behalf of a foreigner, plus forced divestment of the land. The Foreign Business Act sets penalties of up to 3 years imprisonment and fines between 100,000 and 1,000,000 baht for using nominees. Both the Thai shareholders and the foreigner carry legal risk.

How much time is given to sell land if a company is classified as foreign?

The timeline is set by the provincial governor. Section 94 of the Land Code establishes a framework of no less than 180 days and no more than one year. Sales under such an order almost always go through at a discount to market value.

What red flags does the land office look for when screening companies?

Typical indicators include a foreigner as sole director with signing authority, Thai shareholders with no verifiable source of funds for their share payments, no operational activity or revenue, preferred shares with disproportionate voting rights, and the same address or Thai surnames recurring across dozens of companies.

Does a loan agreement between the company and the foreigner offer protection?

The opposite is true. A loan documenting that the foreigner effectively financed the land purchase through the company is treated as evidence that the real beneficial interest belongs to them. Investigation committees read these agreements exactly that way.

Does it still make sense to hold a company if it runs a genuine business?

Yes. The circular targets structures created solely to hold land. A company with real revenue, staff, filed accounts and paid taxes sits in a fundamentally different category, though the documentation bar it must clear is also higher.

Which is safer, a 30-year lease or a condominium?

A freehold condominium gives full ownership and inheritance rights; a lease gives a protected but time-limited right. If your investment horizon is under 15 years and liquidity matters, freehold condominium ownership wins. A leasehold makes sense where a house on land is specifically what you need.

Source: trueresort.net

Ready to invest in Thailand? Our experts will help you find the perfect property.