Thailand's August 2026 Nominee Crackdown: What Foreign Property Owners Need to Know

In the past, an investigation into nominee land ownership in Thailand usually started with a tip-off: a jealous neighbor, a bitter business partner, an ex-spouse. Now it starts inside the land office itself, before anyone has complained at all.

On August 25, 2026, Thailand's Ministry of Interior issued circular No. MorTor 0515.2/Wor 19097 to provincial authorities nationwide. The document shifts the fight against nominee land ownership from a reactive process to an active, systematic search. Land offices are now required to screen companies and partnerships themselves for signs that a legal entity was set up purely so a foreigner could effectively control Thai land.

If a company is found to be 'foreign' under the meaning of the Land Code, one track kicks in: a mandatory sale of the land within a set deadline. If investigators conclude the structure was deliberately built to bypass the law, a second track opens: criminal proceedings. The two are not mutually exclusive.

For anyone holding a villa in Phuket, Samui, or Chonburi through a Thai company with 51% Thai shareholders, the old comfort of 'we haven't been checked in fifteen years' no longer holds up as an argument.

Key Facts

• Interior Ministry circular No. MorTor 0515.2/Wor 19097, dated August 25, 2026, standardizes nominee-ownership checks across all provinces, not just tourist hotspots.

• Provincial investigation committees must now include specialized law enforcement units, including local police, and have expanded access to shareholder records, tax filings, immigration data, and financial information.

• Land offices are moving to proactive screening of legal entities, flagging risk indicators themselves and referring cases to committees that decide whether a company counts as 'foreign' under the Land Code.

• Two consequence tracks exist: forced land disposal by a set date, or criminal prosecution if the structure was built specifically to circumvent ownership restrictions.

• The circular builds on a 2023 measure that first created provincial nominee-investigation committees; the 2026 update adds standardization and mandatory police involvement.

• Under the Land Code, a person holding land on behalf of a foreigner risks up to 2 years in prison and a fine of up to 20,000 THB, with the land subject to forced sale. Under the Foreign Business Act, nominee shareholding carries up to 3 years in prison and fines from 100,000 to 1,000,000 THB.

• Legal alternatives remain untouched: the 49% of sellable area foreign condominium quota, and registered leases of up to 30 years under the Civil and Commercial Code.

Story and Context

Thailand's ban on foreign land ownership predates most of today's expat buyers. It is written into the Land Code of 1954 and has barely been softened since. Technically, Section 96 bis allows a foreigner who invests 40 million THB in government-approved assets to acquire rights to 1 rai of residential land, but approvals granted under this provision are vanishingly rare, and no serious advisor builds a strategy around it.

So the market found a workaround. A Thai company, 51% owned by Thai nationals and 49% by a foreigner, can legally buy land. The whole arrangement rested on two assumptions: that the Thai shareholders existed only on paper, and that the foreigner retained actual control through preferred shares with enhanced voting rights, powers of attorney, and sole signing authority.

The state has always been aware of this pattern. As far back as 2006, the Ministry of Interior required land offices to verify the source of funds for Thai shareholders when a company with foreign participation registered to buy land. In practice, the check became a formality: a bank letter, a signature, and the deal went through. Real cases were rarely pursued, because provincial officials lacked the authority, the data, and the incentive to dig deeper.

The turning point came after the pandemic. Demand for villas in Phuket and Samui surged, and with it came a wave of shell companies sharing the same registered address and the same handful of Thai shareholders spread across dozens of firms. Provincial investigation committees appeared in 2023, but each province operated differently: some met quarterly, others barely met at all.

The August 2026 circular closes exactly that gap. It does not introduce a new prohibition, since the ban already existed. It gives enforcement officers what they lacked before: police representation on committees and access to data that used to sit in separate government silos. A Thai shareholder's tax filings, immigration history, bank transactions, and stakes in other companies are now consolidated into a single case file.

A related crackdown is already producing hard numbers elsewhere in the country. In Surat Thani province, which covers Koh Samui and Koh Phangan, investigators identified 112 entities on Koh Phangan alone with foreign shareholding likely exceeding legal limits, spanning 86 rai and 3 ngan 42.4 square wah across 124 land plots. Disposal orders have already been issued for eight entities covering nine plots, with 28 more cases under review. In Phuket, separate reporting has flagged over 300 legal entities holding land under apparent foreign control, with more than 30 companies already ordered to sell.

What exactly are inspectors looking for? A Thai shareholder with no declared income capable of covering their stated share of the company. A business with no revenue, no employees, and no activity beyond holding a single plot of land. Preferred shares granting the foreigner disproportionate voting power. The same Thai national appearing as a shareholder in fifteen different firms. A registered address that matches the office of the consultancy that set the companies up in the first place.

Here is the uncomfortable part for buyers. Many assumed for years that '49% ordinary shares plus voting control' was itself a form of protection. In fact, it is now one of the clearest indicators of nominee ownership. The more carefully a foreigner's control was engineered, the more obvious it becomes that the Thai shareholders are nominal.

The second uncomfortable part concerns the Thai side of the arrangement. The Land Code's criminal provision is aimed squarely at whoever holds land on a foreigner's behalf. A Thai relative, secretary, or acquaintance who signed papers for 5,000 THB a year is now facing real prison exposure. Once that risk becomes concrete rather than theoretical, nominee shareholders start behaving unpredictably, and that is exactly when it becomes clear who actually owns the villa.

The administrative track looks gentler but hits the wallet hard. The Land Code requires illegally acquired land to be disposed of within a deadline set by the authorities, and failure to comply triggers a forced sale. A sale under deadline pressure is almost always a discounted sale, and hopes of exiting at full market value rarely survive that process.

For residential property, a company structure built solely to hold land is simply no longer worth the risk. A freehold unit within a condominium's foreign quota, or a villa on land held under a registered 30-year lease, offers less ambition but dramatically fewer headaches. A company structure is only justified where there is genuine operating business, revenue, staff, proper accounting, and a real commercial rationale for owning the land. If your budget and goals fit within a condominium purchase, this entire discussion does not apply to you: buy in your own name and keep it simple.

One fair counterpoint deserves mention: there is no need to panic and dismantle every working structure. A company with real operations, Thai shareholders who genuinely invested capital and receive dividends, and proper accounting is not a nominee arrangement, it is an ordinary business. The difference is proven with documents, not nerves.

FAQ

Can a foreigner own land in Thailand in 2026?

No, with a narrow exception under Section 96 bis of the Land Code: an investment of at least 40 million THB in approved assets can grant rights to 1 rai of residential land, subject to separate approval. Very few approvals are actually granted. A foreigner can, however, own the building on the land as a separate asset from the land itself.

What exactly did the August 25, 2026 circular change?

Checks became proactive. Land offices must now search for signs of nominee ownership among companies and partnerships themselves, and provincial committees have been reinforced with investigative agencies and given access to tax, immigration, and financial data.

What happens if a company is found to be a nominee structure?

Two scenarios apply. Administrative: the company is classified as foreign and ordered to sell the land by a set date. Criminal: if the entity is proven to have been created to circumvent the law, charges follow. Under the Land Code, holding land for a foreigner carries up to 2 years in prison and a fine of up to 20,000 THB.

Are Thai shareholders also at risk?

Yes, and primarily so. A nominee holder is liable under the Land Code, while the Foreign Business Act punishes nominee shareholding with up to 3 years in prison and fines from 100,000 to 1,000,000 THB.

Is a 30-year lease still legal?

Yes. The Civil and Commercial Code caps property leases at 30 years, with the option to register the contract at the land office. Promises of automatic 30+30 year renewals carry no legal force against a new owner, since that is only a contractual promise from a specific landlord.

Are condominiums affected by the new checks?

Not directly: the 49% of sellable area foreign quota in condominiums is a legitimate mechanism untouched by the circular. But if a unit is registered to a Thai company purely to bypass an exhausted quota, the same scrutiny logic applies.

How do I know if my structure is at risk?

Check four things: whether Thai shareholders have documented income matching the size of their stated investment, whether the company conducts real business and files proper accounts, whether preferred shares grant the foreigner disproportionate voting power, and how many other companies list your Thai partners as shareholders.

What should someone who already bought a villa through a company do?

Start with an audit by a Thai lawyer unrelated to whoever registered the company. Exit options generally come down to either bringing the company into genuine operating compliance, or selling the asset on your own terms and timeline rather than under a government deadline.

Source: Khaosod English

Ready to invest in Thailand? Our experts will help you find the perfect property.